When a Filling Won’t Cut It: The Case for Indirect Restorations
- naytoghlo
- Aug 3
- 8 min read
Updated: Aug 9
What is the primary purpose of posterior indirect restorations, and when are they preferred over direct restorations?
Posterior indirect restorations are primarily used to protect structurally compromised teeth, particularly those with large existing fillings (like extensive amalgam restorations) where the remaining tooth structure is thin and prone to fracture. Unlike direct restorations (like composite resin fillings), indirect restorations, such as onlays, overlays, and crowns, are fabricated in a lab and offer superior durability, resistance to fracture, and better marginal precision. They are preferred when the tooth's remaining cusps are too thin (less than 2mm) and susceptible to flexure and breakage under occlusal load, or in difficult-to-access areas where achieving precise marginal fit with direct materials is challenging. Indirect restorations also offer better long-term aesthetic stability, resisting stain and discoloration more effectively than composite resin.
What are the key factors influencing the decision between a direct and an indirect restoration?
The decision to use a direct versus an indirect restoration is a nuanced one, considering several factors:
Occlusal Risk Factors: Patients exhibiting signs of heavy occlusal loading, such as wear facets, cracks on existing restorations or tooth structure, or a history of fractured posterior teeth, are at higher risk of fracture and are better candidates for indirect restorations. The location of the tooth in the arch (closer to the TMJ, like molars, experiencing higher forces) also plays a role.
Occlusal Contacts: Specific occlusal contacts on cuspal inclines or directly on the margin between a filling and tooth indicate a high risk of fracture, necessitating an indirect restoration even if no fracture has occurred yet.
Remaining Tooth Structure: The thickness of the remaining cusps is critical. If cusps are less than 2mm thick after caries removal or old restoration removal, an indirect restoration (specifically an overlay) is recommended to provide cuspal coverage. For thicker cusps (greater than 2mm), a partial coverage onlay might be considered, though occlusal and patient factors can still sway the decision towards full coverage.
Adhesive Potential (Enamel Ring): The presence of a strong, continuous ring of enamel around the preparation allows for effective adhesive bonding, which is ideal for partial coverage restorations like onlays and overlays. If there's significant loss of enamel, conventional cementation with a full coverage crown might be a more predictable option.
Cosmetic and Periodontal Considerations: For teeth in the smile line (e.g., premolars), cosmetic integration might necessitate a veneerlay. In cases with periodontal defects, particularly furcation involvement, a crown with a "barreled-in" preparation may be preferred to improve cleansability and long-term prognosis.
What is the difference between an onlay, an overlay, and a conventional crown?
While often used interchangeably or with some confusion, these terms refer to different extents of tooth coverage:
Onlay: A partial coverage restoration that covers one or more cusps but not all of them. It aims to preserve more natural tooth structure, particularly if some cusps are thick and healthy.
Overlay: This term describes a restoration that covers all the cusps of a tooth, effectively sitting "over" the entire occlusal surface. The key distinction from a conventional crown, in this context, is that an overlay often involves less buccal/lingual/mesial/distal reduction than a crown, primarily focusing on occlusal coverage and being defect-driven.
Conventional Crown: A full coverage restoration that encases the entire clinical crown of the tooth. It involves more comprehensive reduction of the tooth structure in all planes, with the finish line typically at or below the gingival margin. Crowns are usually cemented conventionally and are preferred when extensive tooth structure is lost, or when strong adhesive bonding is not possible due to limited enamel.
What materials are commonly used for indirect posterior restorations, and what are their pros and cons?
Three main categories of materials are used for indirect posterior restorations:
Gold/Metal (Non-precious metal):
Pros: Minimally invasive, highly durable, and long-lasting.
Cons: Not aesthetically pleasing, and bonding is not as strong as with ceramic options. Less popular today due to aesthetic concerns.
All-Ceramic (Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate - e.g., IPS e.max):
Pros: Highly aesthetic, can be minimally invasive, adhesively bondable (especially e.max), biocompatible, strong, and long-lasting (e.max has excellent long-term evidence). Zirconia is exceptionally strong, making it suitable for full coverage crowns and vertical preparations, especially in bruxism cases.
Cons: Technique-sensitive for bonding, difficult to repair fractures (often requires full replacement), and can be brittle before bonding. Zirconia bonding is less straightforward and arguably not as strong as lithium disilicate bonding.
Resin-Based Hybrids (Composite or resin-infiltrated ceramic):
Pros: Repairable chairside (can be etched, bonded, and repaired with composite), can be aesthetic, and useful for provisionals. More cost-effective.
Cons: Generally less durable and strong than ceramic or gold, prone to fracturing and requiring more frequent repairs, and do not last as long as ceramic or gold. Not considered a definitive long-term restoration by some clinicians.
Between zirconia and lithium disilicate, e.max (lithium disilicate) is highly favored for partial coverage adhesive restorations due to its extensive long-term evidence, strong bondability, and excellent aesthetics. Zirconia is preferred for full coverage crowns and vertical preparations, especially in situations with limited enamel for bonding or in cases with high occlusal stress, where it is often conventionally cemented.
How is the tooth prepared for a lithium disilicate (e.max) onlay/overlay?
The preparation for a lithium disilicate onlay or overlay emphasizes minimal invasion while ensuring sufficient material thickness and rounded forms:
Occlusal Reduction: Aim for 1.5mm of occlusal reduction. While thinner preparations (0.5-1mm) might be possible, 1.5mm offers greater longevity and fracture resistance for the ceramic.
Rounded Forms: All internal line angles and corners must be rounded. Sharp angles create stress points in the ceramic and can lead to fracture.
Defect-Driven Preparation: The preparation is dictated by existing defects or previous large restorations. Existing box forms from old amalgam restorations are utilized for additional resistance form.
Functional/Non-Functional Cusp Bevel: A 0.5mm chamfer is created on the functional/non-functional cusps at the facial surface to allow for correct ceramic emergence profile and adequate thickness at the cusp slope transition.
Interproximal Reduction: A needle-shaped bur with a fender wedge is used to carefully break interproximal contacts, angling the bur towards the lingual to facilitate swift contact breakage while maintaining parallelism to the tooth's long axis.
Immediate Dentine Sealing (IDS): After preparation, any exposed dentine is immediately sealed with a thin layer of flowable composite resin. This improves bond strength, reduces post-operative sensitivity, and protects the pulp.
Finishing: The preparation margins are refined using fine diamonds, ultrasonics (to remove unsupported enamel), or Arkansas stones to create a smooth, clean finish. Polishing the prep is also recommended for improved impression accuracy.
What is the rationale and technique for vertical preparations, and when are they indicated?
Vertical preparation is a specific technique where there is no defined horizontal finish line or margin. Instead, the tooth structure is continuously trimmed from the coronal part onto the root surface, creating a smooth, continuous surface without a chamfer or shoulder.
Rationale:
Access to Root Surface: Provides access to the CEJ (cementoenamel junction) and root surface area, which can be beneficial in cases with furcation involvement or deep subgingival margins.
Increased Ferrule: Offers more tooth structure for retention and resistance form, particularly useful in cases with limited crown height, severe tooth surface loss, or bruxism.
Improved Soft Tissue Response: When done with Biological Oriented Preparation (BOP) technique, it traumatizes the soft tissue, which then heals to form a new epithelial attachment around the restoration, improving soft tissue quality and cleansability around the tooth.
Indications:
Cases with lack of enamel or significant tooth surface loss.
Bruxism cases where increased retention and resistance are desired.
Teeth with periodontal defects, especially those with furcation involvement, where a "barreled-in" prep can eliminate the furcation.
When a conventional crown preparation is not conservative enough or when a defined margin is difficult to establish.
Often favored with zirconia restorations due to its strength and ability to be cemented conventionally without requiring strong adhesive bonds.
What are the critical steps for successful impression taking or scanning for indirect restorations?
Successful impression taking or scanning is crucial for the precision fit of indirect restorations. Key steps include:
Gingival Retraction: The double cord technique is highly recommended, especially for posterior teeth.
A small cord (e.g., triple zero) is packed subgingivally for vertical retraction, pushing the margin towards the clinician.
A larger cord (e.g., double zero or single zero) is placed superficially for horizontal retraction, pushing the gingiva away from the margin.
Hemostatic agents (like Viscostat Clear or lidocaine with adrenaline) can be used to control bleeding.
The larger cord is removed after about 5 minutes, leaving the smaller cord in place during the impression/scan to maintain retraction and provide contrast for scanners.
Moisture and Hemorrhage Control: Ensuring the preparation is completely dry and free of bleeding is paramount. Time should be taken to manage bleeding before proceeding. Electrosurgery or a thermal bur can be used for excising excess gingiva if significant tissue is creeping onto the margin.
Impression Technique (if not scanning):
One-stage technique: Light body impression material is squirted around the prep and onto the heavy body/putty in the tray, and seated together in one go. This is often preferred for its efficiency and reduced margin for error.
Two-stage technique: Heavy body/putty is initially seated with a spacer, then removed. The spacer is removed, and light body is applied to the prep and the "special tray" created by the set putty before reseating. While some studies contradict on accuracy, the one-stage technique is often favored for its simplicity.
Managing Complications:
Bleeding: Use hemostatic agents, local anesthetic with adrenaline, and allow sufficient time for these to work.
Insufficient Retraction: Consider larger cords or gentle electrocautery/thermal bur to remove excess tissue.
Bubbles/Tears in Impression: Block out undercuts with composite or wax to prevent tearing. Ensure light body is applied to both the prep and the tray to avoid air entrapment, and allow sufficient setting time for the impression material.
Gagging: For upper arch impressions, a lower arch tray can sometimes be used to reduce material going to the back of the mouth, or consider scanning.
Why is effective lab communication vital for indirect restorations, and what information should be provided?
Effective communication with the dental laboratory is fundamental to the success and aesthetic integration of indirect restorations, as they are custom-fabricated. Without clear instructions, errors can occur, leading to ill-fitting or aesthetically unsatisfactory results. Essential information to provide includes:
Shade Information:Take shade tabs at the start of the appointment before teeth dehydrate.
Provide photographs (mandatory) with shade tabs placed in the same plane as the tooth.
Indicate your preferred shade (e.g., A2) and also provide shades one step lighter and darker to show gradients.
Consider specific shade guides from the lab for their ceramic materials.
Include pre-operative occlusal photos to show natural fissure patterns and general tooth morphology for better characterization.
Restoration Conditioning: Specify whether the lab should pre-etch and silanate the ceramic or if you prefer to do it chairside (often preferred to avoid over-etching after try-in).
Occlusal Guidance Scheme: Clearly communicate the desired occlusal scheme (e.g., canine guidance, group function) to ensure the restoration functions harmoniously with the patient's existing occlusion and avoids interferences.
Material and Ingot Specifics: Clearly state the material desired (e.g., e.max, zirconia). For specific aesthetic or strength needs (e.g., dark stump shade requiring a low translucency ingot), communicate these to the technician.
Quality Expectation vs. Cost: Be realistic about the correlation between laboratory fees and the quality of aesthetic and functional outcomes. Premium results often require a higher investment in lab work.
Ultimately, a detailed prescription, combined with high-quality photographs and ongoing dialogue with the lab, minimizes unknowns and empowers the technician to create a restoration that meets both the functional and aesthetic demands of the case.
Comments